Basic difference between Ayurveda and Allopathy
Ayurveda :-
Pathyasati Gadartasya Kimaushadha Nishevarnah.
Pathyaasati Gadartasya Kimaushadha Nishevanaih.
ie-
If the patient follows pathya (proper diet), then what is the need of medicine and treatment and if he does not follow pathya (proper diet), then what is the need of taking medicine?
This verse is probably from the Charaka Samhita, which means that Ayurveda emphasizes on a balanced lifestyle with proper living and adherence to a healthy routine, and even when ill, in Ayurveda, there is a compulsion of abstinence with medicine so that there is a permanent cure from the disease. Liberation can be found but Allopathy is just the opposite.
What is allopathy:-
Neither the rule of getting up to sleep nor the abstinence of food and water
Medicine-medicine-medicine only medicine is allopath.
Check expensive, medicine is also expensive, all hospitals are expensive
The inflation which is not under the control of the poor is an allopath.
Found in several hundred drug shops worth a few rupees
Allopath is a big waste in the name of medicine.
No side effects and permanent relief
Air is less effective, more air is air allopath.
There is competition of disease with medicine since then
Since I am allopath in my country
Allopathy was created after studying Ayurveda
It is true that allopath is the shadow of Ayurveda.
That is to say, the biggest drawback of allopathy is having side effects in every medicine, being expensive and suppressing the disease by not eliminating the cause of the disease. Whereas Ayurvedic medicines are completely harmless and have the properties to eliminate the disease from the root.
Note - Today, due to the rarity of Ayurveda, we all are mostly dependent on allopaths, so it would be ungrateful to reject allopathic system completely, but when allopathy is compared with Ayurveda, then the reality will be the same. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
